Rules for editing the wiki

[cosmicr]

Sorry I didn't know where else to post this.

I have found a lot of the SCI wiki stuff is really outdated. There's a lot of straight up copy and paste articles/documents from other sources which have become outdated.

I have been tempted to make corrections/revisions etc, but I am worried that editing these pages would ruin the prosperity of these articles. I think it is important that the original versions of some of them be preserved too.

Even the 'front' page of the SCI wiki could use a face lift (especially to make SCI development more appealing to newcomers), but again I don't want to put anyone out by making unsolicited changes. The last "news" was 4 years ago hahaha.

Just want to know what others think? Collector it's your baby, I don't want to spoil it!

[Kawa]

Aren't wikis kinda known for having a history function?

[Collector]

Yeah, don't worry too much. All of the original versions can be seen in the history, so nothing is lost. I am more concerned over maintaining stylistic consistency than any updating you might do. One thing that I would like to see is updating the tutorials and code samples to Sierra Script.